Bad Science Almost Imposing Restrictive Laws

[popeyespappy]

1. If the evidence and the science is robust, then show me what the global climate change trend over the last 150 years would be without human activity? Where's the graph that shows the recreated anthropogenic-free climate change over the last 15 decades?

Ask and ye shall receive.



http://www.skepticalscience.com/its-not-us-advanced.htm

2. Actually the data shows the raw global mean surface temperatures, many of which get adjusted (normalized) before being given to climate scientists, much of the original raw data is now unverifiable/unavailable. It is generally accepted that the data shows a clear 0.7 degree warming trend in the 20th century, but the data itself, says nothing it's just data.

Who normalizes what and what exactly is it that you think is unavailable?

The Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature Study has created a preliminary merged data set by combining 1.6 billion temperature reports from 16 preexisting data archives.

http://berkeleyearth.org/results-summary/

NASA, NOAA, Hadley and 13 other datasets are available for you to look at if you so desire. Climate change skeptic Richard Muller at Berkley already has in the Koch funded Berkley Earth Temperature Study. His conclusion was that the temperature models are correct and anthropogenic green house gasses are the reason for the warming.