RE: Bad Science Almost Imposing Restrictive Laws
January 22, 2013 at 6:38 pm
(This post was last modified: January 22, 2013 at 6:46 pm by Sciworks.)
Ok - Here we go again:
If you Google 'cosmic rays global warming' the top entry is:
AGW Sermon Here
That this twat is at the top of the search results is only surprising if you have studied and followed this research for the last 20 years and realise that there have been been many top level experiments, satellite studies, be-10 core samples taken and the CLOUD experiment at CERN.
Anyway the final 'proof' of his ramble is this chart, which 'proves' that cosmic rays have been steady over that period, it shows the 11 years solar cycles affecting cosmic rays, but Solar Scientists have data that the Sun has been increasing in activity for the last 100 yeas.
![[Image: cosmicrays.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i846.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fab25%2Fawgydawg1313%2FGlobal%2520Warming%2Fcosmicrays.jpg)
He was very proud of this, see what he writes under the chart - "You see? It just doesn't work, guys."
If the Sun's activity is increasing, then cosmic rays should have been decreasing for the last 100 years. As the Sun's activity increases, its magnetic field 'expands' (more complicated than this) and decreases the cosmic rays getting to the Earth.
When you see charts of global warming, they show it from 1800, so I tried to find a chart with cosmic ray data for that period, but couldn't.
I went to NOAA and they had raw cosmic ray data:
Cosmic Ray Data Here
I then swiped this into Excel and came up with two charts, I have inverted the Y axis so that it is easier to compare it with global warming charts.
Full Data:
![[Image: cosmic-rays-4.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i846.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fab25%2Fawgydawg1313%2FGlobal%2520Warming%2Fcosmic-rays-4.jpg)
With as much imagination, faith and belief that the congregation has for AGW, you can see the end of the Medieval Warm Period and the Mini Ice Age, check it out.
I then plotted the same data for 1800 to 1994:
![[Image: cosmic-rays-3.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i846.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fab25%2Fawgydawg1313%2FGlobal%2520Warming%2Fcosmic-rays-3.jpg)
Not surprisingly for me, it fits the global warming line used in all the other AGW charts. It clearly shows cosmic rays declining from 1800 to the present day.
The theory is, that as the cosmic rays decrease, there is less cloud cover and more warming. Remember I have inverted the Y axis. Does this show a trend? I think it does. So why don't all the Climate Priests jump on this and praise the Lord of Global Warming, could it be that Carbon Trading may be affected?
This is data from NOAA, not some exaggerated computer model from the imagination of a Climate Priest.
If you Google 'cosmic rays global warming' the top entry is:
AGW Sermon Here
That this twat is at the top of the search results is only surprising if you have studied and followed this research for the last 20 years and realise that there have been been many top level experiments, satellite studies, be-10 core samples taken and the CLOUD experiment at CERN.
Anyway the final 'proof' of his ramble is this chart, which 'proves' that cosmic rays have been steady over that period, it shows the 11 years solar cycles affecting cosmic rays, but Solar Scientists have data that the Sun has been increasing in activity for the last 100 yeas.
He was very proud of this, see what he writes under the chart - "You see? It just doesn't work, guys."
If the Sun's activity is increasing, then cosmic rays should have been decreasing for the last 100 years. As the Sun's activity increases, its magnetic field 'expands' (more complicated than this) and decreases the cosmic rays getting to the Earth.
When you see charts of global warming, they show it from 1800, so I tried to find a chart with cosmic ray data for that period, but couldn't.
I went to NOAA and they had raw cosmic ray data:
Cosmic Ray Data Here
I then swiped this into Excel and came up with two charts, I have inverted the Y axis so that it is easier to compare it with global warming charts.
Full Data:
With as much imagination, faith and belief that the congregation has for AGW, you can see the end of the Medieval Warm Period and the Mini Ice Age, check it out.
I then plotted the same data for 1800 to 1994:
Not surprisingly for me, it fits the global warming line used in all the other AGW charts. It clearly shows cosmic rays declining from 1800 to the present day.
The theory is, that as the cosmic rays decrease, there is less cloud cover and more warming. Remember I have inverted the Y axis. Does this show a trend? I think it does. So why don't all the Climate Priests jump on this and praise the Lord of Global Warming, could it be that Carbon Trading may be affected?
This is data from NOAA, not some exaggerated computer model from the imagination of a Climate Priest.
