OK, think about what you said there. "If" is a mighty big word when you make a claim about absolutes. So you recognise that there is a possibility that something may be presented that you haven't covered.
The presupposition is that your opponent has lost before they even started (or finished I think you claimed) yet you do not know what "evidence" will be presented. Remember, you used "if"...
As for "appologetics", I don't get it. I don't make appologies for my faith, Imma dick that way. Look at my sig, you have no clue where I'm coming from.
.
The presupposition is that your opponent has lost before they even started (or finished I think you claimed) yet you do not know what "evidence" will be presented. Remember, you used "if"...
As for "appologetics", I don't get it. I don't make appologies for my faith, Imma dick that way. Look at my sig, you have no clue where I'm coming from.
.
