(February 3, 2013 at 2:45 pm)catfish Wrote: The presupposition is that your opponent has lost before they even started (or finished I think you claimed) yet you do not know what "evidence" will be presented. Remember, you used "if"...
You don't think that if Christians had a verifiable form of any of the proofs listed in the video that would work, it would be trumpeted by every religious media outlet, especially in predominantly Christian America? You don't think real, tangible proof for god would be kind of a big deal and that if it were present, we wouldn't have heard about it long before any theological debate as to its authenticity?
Quote:As for "appologetics", I don't get it. I don't make appologies for my faith, Imma dick that way. Look at my sig, you have no clue where I'm coming from.
.
Well, okay, fine. Most of us here have heard all there is to hear from this particular subgenre of christian debate tactics, though. We can reasonably fathom where the argument is going before it's made; it's not like they're coming up with anything new and better, after all.
Same old schtick requires the same old response, why not cut out the middle man?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
