RE: New Video on Apologetics
February 5, 2013 at 1:35 am
(This post was last modified: February 5, 2013 at 1:36 am by catfish.)
(February 5, 2013 at 1:26 am)Cinjin Wrote: People, this thread has nothing to do with unicorns. I was making a comparison to believing in things that have no evidence of existence. Catfish tried to change his statement by saying that he keeps an open mind for all possible future evidence. That is extremely misleading, as that is NOT what he said.
Here is the difference. Catfish believes in the christian god and various parts of the Bible based on evidence that has not yet been uncovered. Does everybody see what he said? He's not keeping the god of the bible a remote possibility based on evidence he doesn't have. No no. He ALREADY believes in the god of the bible and the holy scriptures based on this missing evidence.
THAT is the difference. Drop the unicorn thing ... it was his way of avoiding what he said which is: Evidence doesn't actually have to be presented in order to be considered evidence.
It's utter stupidity.
No, I have my "proof" of God, I was born with it.
The difference between an atheist and myself is that I allow for 1 more possibility than they do.
.
As for the unicorn example, think deeper next time.
.
