(February 5, 2013 at 11:36 am)catfish Wrote: The original claim was "victory" before he had been presented evidence, a presuppositional fallacy, PERIOD.
A greater textbook example of a straw man fallacy would be difficult to imagine.
If you actually watched the video, the point was if the best you can offer is "blah blah blah", which, by the way is NOT evidence but an untested hypothesis at best, then you've failed to meet the burden of proof.
Show me evidence and you have my attention.
Did Darth Vader use the Ontological Argument for The Force when he found an admiral's lack of faith to be disturbing?
I guarantee you not a single AForcist left that briefing room that day.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
... -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
... -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
