(February 15, 2013 at 1:40 pm)Zone Wrote: There's negativity and being firm in your convictions. The conviction that no supernatural shit could possibly ever happen or exist because you happen to have strong opinion that it can't for some reason. Agnosticism that's a better way of doing it.
And you think this is my first rodeo? I've been debating online for 12 years, this dodge is not new to me.
No, there is a difference between not knowing something and assuming just to assume because it sounds nice. Lots of things we might wish to be true does not mean we assume.
Secondly, agnostic is not a stand alone word. It can go in front of atheist. I am an agnostic atheist.
I am a flat out atheist in regards to past and current claims. Nothing presented so far is credible. But strictly from a semantic sense since I have not lived the future, while finding it highly unlikely to billions of places to the right of the decimal .000000000000000000000000000000000000000001, it is true I do not know the future.
But I am not going to lose any sleep discarding claims of invisible friends anymore than I need to worry about the future as far as pink unicorns existing.
"It could happen" yea and monkeys could fly out of my butt since I haven't lived the future, but it would be stupid of me to worry about that "just in case".
