(February 16, 2013 at 7:06 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(February 16, 2013 at 2:25 pm)TheLameMayWalk Wrote: He does have a bit of a point. Look around us. Is this not beautiful? (you know, the parts of it that are still nature and not touched by man)
This could not be a mere coinsidence!
Who says it is?
The earth, the creatures on it, even the universe it inhabits, is the culmination of billions of years of physical processes working ceaselessly, constructing and reconstructing the natural world over and over. And the process is hardly completed, either.Why does a thing need a designer to be beautiful?
Hey, actually: why is it that things touched by man are unnatural and therefore bad, and yet things you believe were designed by god are beautiful? In your mind, both things have designers, both things are as unnatural as the other. Think about that.
Things touched my man are unnatural. Unnatural is, erm...not natural. I prefer the natural, the things created by Him. Even if you eliminate the God part, nature is superior to anything man has done do it in the history of the Earth.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
![[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FYAAgdMk.gif)
