(February 18, 2013 at 1:08 am)Question Mark Wrote:(February 17, 2013 at 9:18 pm)TheLameMayWalk Wrote: Things touched my man are unnatural. Unnatural is, erm...not natural. I prefer the natural, the things created by Him. Even if you eliminate the God part, nature is superior to anything man has done do it in the history of the Earth.
To be fair, calling what man does "unnatural" is merely our anthrocentric point of view appearing before us again. As being part of nature, what we do is natural, it is natural to us to do what it is we do, as it is is our nature.
Also here we're getting into a matter of opinion. Red is better than blue, green is better than red. Nature is better than man-made things.
From a practical standpoint, I think you'll disagree with yourself there, for as other people have been kind enough to point out, houses are unnatural. Clothes are unnatural. Medicine, electronics, technology of any kind, is unnatural. I dare say you'd not be in favour of washing yourself in a river when you have a bath or shower available. It's much safer, you know.
Humans need four things to survive (and it is natural knowledge that we do): food, water, clothing, and shelter. So I do not mock any sort of cooking, clothing, or housing.
I do mock deforestation, large buildings, other industrialization that subtracts the nature around it.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
![[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FYAAgdMk.gif)