Pascal's Wager (the new version)

[Muslim Scholar]

But you also proved that the Quran is not perfect, in that it is easily misinterpreted. You can say it is the fault of people, but take this instance: You have a man, a leader. He has three followers. He tells each of the followers the following: "Go forth, and gather that which is red and a fruit, and bring it to me." One goes and gets an apple. Another goes and gets a raspberry. And the third goes and gets a rose, and a peach. Who followed the orders correctly? All of them, actually. But then the leader tells the second and third man, "No, you are wrong, you did not obey me properly." He then shoots the hapless men. You are a bystander. You witness this. Do you say "the men deserved it because they interpreted his orders wrong?" Or do you say "That guy is a sadistic prick and it was HIS fault for not making his orders clear"?

If you choose option 1: you are a fucking moron. I am not going to explain why, because it would be a colossal waste of my precious, finite time trying to explain simple logic to someone so dead in the brain. If you choose option 2, then you suddenly understand why I find your statement about "interpretation" to be utter bullshit in this context.

I'm choosing neither
God allowed people to understand/misunderstand then choose
If a person is honest and he really tried, (although he chooses wrong) God will not punish him, Actually he will be rewarded but not as good as who chooses right

You basically just told me "the quran is true because the quran says so."

I didn't say so, proving that the Quran came from God will come later