(March 10, 2013 at 2:15 pm)jstrodel Wrote: Not one person has made a single argument against the claim "atheism as a movement relies on the support of people under the age of 25 that it gains through drugs, sex and political propaganda".
I can think of two reasons why.
One, it's a patently ridiculous and grossly offensive claim that only you are making and is refuted simply by actually meeting and talking to a variety of atheists.
Two, you haven't provided any proof that it is true to begin with. We aren't required to refute every dumb claim made by every raving lunatic who comes into these forums with a bible clenched in their hands and an aim to disprove atheism. You've made a claim that, on the surface, is very silly, and all you've done is make it over and over without a single shred of proof. Hell, you haven't even so much as detailed the mechanism of how atheists use drugs, sex and propaganda to gain support. What are we, a cult?
How about instead of making up crazy bullshit and then expecting us to refute it, you do the damn legwork yourself and justify it? Or else, how are we wrong for calling it tin foil hat level thinking?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
