RE: hipster Atheist
March 11, 2013 at 12:49 am
(This post was last modified: March 11, 2013 at 12:50 am by jstrodel.)
What religious people tolerate sex and drugs? Do you care that you are a liar?
Why can't you see that you are selling a product. You are so dishonest. You are a not a liberal. A real liberal would apply the same standard to himself that he applies to others. You would say that tolerance is advocacy in another context. Why can't you just step out of your ideological box and care about people for one or two minutes?
Prove the statement tolerance is not the same as advocacy. What college or highschool is there in the US that tolerates drugs? None.
If I am wrong, very little happens. THere is no risk of pregnancy, very young people are not enticed through the swirls and sounds of rock and roll and the drug and sex culture, nothing happens. People have to deny themselves a lot.
If you are wrong, a lot of peoples lives are destroyed. And actually, let me tell you something, you are wrong. I know a whole lot of peoples whose lives are destroyed. You are so dishonest you are trying to argue that religious people tolerate drugs and sexual immorality just as much as atheists do. You are probably going to cite something about Catholic sex abuse or the crusades or something totally unrelated. Cut and paste apologetics.
I don't think I am really going to get anywhere with someone who is so desperate to be right that he is going to argue that religious people tolerate drugs and sex and rock and roll and that there is an equal risk associate with abstinence than there is with a rock star lifestyle.
You are asking me to demostrate what I just demostrated. Why can't you just acknowledge that atheism is to a large degree the product of a youth culture centered around drugs and sex? It is because you are dishonest, and you don't care about the truth, and you want to argue, that is why.
Why can't you see that you are selling a product. You are so dishonest. You are a not a liberal. A real liberal would apply the same standard to himself that he applies to others. You would say that tolerance is advocacy in another context. Why can't you just step out of your ideological box and care about people for one or two minutes?
Prove the statement tolerance is not the same as advocacy. What college or highschool is there in the US that tolerates drugs? None.
If I am wrong, very little happens. THere is no risk of pregnancy, very young people are not enticed through the swirls and sounds of rock and roll and the drug and sex culture, nothing happens. People have to deny themselves a lot.
If you are wrong, a lot of peoples lives are destroyed. And actually, let me tell you something, you are wrong. I know a whole lot of peoples whose lives are destroyed. You are so dishonest you are trying to argue that religious people tolerate drugs and sexual immorality just as much as atheists do. You are probably going to cite something about Catholic sex abuse or the crusades or something totally unrelated. Cut and paste apologetics.
I don't think I am really going to get anywhere with someone who is so desperate to be right that he is going to argue that religious people tolerate drugs and sex and rock and roll and that there is an equal risk associate with abstinence than there is with a rock star lifestyle.
You are asking me to demostrate what I just demostrated. Why can't you just acknowledge that atheism is to a large degree the product of a youth culture centered around drugs and sex? It is because you are dishonest, and you don't care about the truth, and you want to argue, that is why.
