(March 16, 2013 at 9:16 am)enrico Wrote:But a scientist and a religious person trying to speculate what lies outside the laws of physics will pointless from both perspectives, both speculations will still be speculations based on no useful evidence.(March 16, 2013 at 6:12 am)paulpablo Wrote: Your hypothesis seems fine that there might be something outside of the laws of physics but then you assert that there will be a god outside of the laws of physics, since scientists havent fully worked out the laws of physics then there wouldnt be a chance of figuring out or even speculating what would be outside the laws of physics
It is important to use the right tool when you try to progress in some task.
If you give a hammer to a computer programmer and a computer to a carpenter they will not be able to do much, but if you exchange the tools you will find that the two guys will be able to perform their duty.
The same apply to a scientist.
When a scientist insist in trying to discover what may lies outside this dimension using physical science and not intuitional science then he-she will not be able to go anywhere.
To use your analogy it would be like getting the computer programmer and the carpenter in a room together and then saying "here's a dildo, go and perform your carpenter and computer programming duties with this"
Are you ready for the fire? We are firemen. WE ARE FIREMEN! The heat doesn’t bother us. We live in the heat. We train in the heat. It tells us that we’re ready, we’re at home, we’re where we’re supposed to be. Flames don’t intimidate us. What do we do? We control the flame. We control them. We move the flames where we want to. And then we extinguish them.
Impersonation is treason.