(April 2, 2013 at 2:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:Clearly, you don't know what a dimension is.(March 31, 2013 at 8:31 pm)pocaracas Wrote: Ah.... "your time"!!!My definition is much better; why?
And here I was thinking we were talking about standard universal time...
Oh well, another looney trying to redefine things and coming up with his own version of the world.... -.-'
Have fun with "your time".
because it is a partial definition of time
It is accepted by all people
The universal definition of time, is not even definite or agreed on.
So just analyzing the sequence of events is better than using the whole definition of time which is not universally agreed on.
Time is a dimension. That's the universal definition of time.
It is a special dimension along which all other 3 spatial dimensions move in a fixed direction, but a dimension nonetheless.
And if you start with a faulty concept of something so basic, how do you expect to arrive at a proper conclusion?
(April 2, 2013 at 2:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:Yours is not a physical theory... only an idea arising from a warped notion of sets.Quote:It is impossible to demonstrate an infinite, but there is no theory (that I'm aware of) which ends up with a finite spacetime as a result.Now there is! mine
(April 2, 2013 at 2:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:It was a hope... but you stated your ideas so well that... look at this:Quote:Just in case you missed where the error was... after some 10 pages, someone is going to show it to you.Is this a belief?
(April 2, 2013 at 2:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:Then what did you define it as? I read a finite series of elements, when you wrote " All Statuses separated from (1/1/2000 00:00:00) by a finite number of seconds "Quote:You defined Set1 as a finite set.I didn't
(April 2, 2013 at 2:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:I must be losing marbles as I can't see where that can be inferred from "All Statuses separated from (1/1/2000 00:00:00) by an infinite number of seconds"Quote:because of something no one understands related to set1... what does set1 have to do with set2?Members of set 2 must start after (before in time) members of set 1
(April 2, 2013 at 2:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:yeah.... in case you forgot how to read, here's what came before that sentence "Now, here's a nice analogy to your random toothpick drop."Quote: How likely is it that you'd find 3 in a straight line? Damned difficult to find, but not impossible.My proof doesn't include any probabilities.
hmmmm... strange... Where did I get that toothpick story from?
LOL! It's from Drew, in here: https://atheistforums.org/thread-17548-p...#pid424209.
Sorry for mixing you guys up, it's just that you sound so alike, and yet, one is christian and the other muslim...
ok, no probabilities on your side. carry on.