(April 6, 2013 at 6:31 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:Quote:So, you defined something, which "is clearly finite", but you didn't define it as finite...It is just for clarifications, the point to prove is for Set 2 not Set 1.
Set2, then... I don't get what it is that you want to claim with this set... here's where you mention it in your OP:
(March 18, 2013 at 6:07 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Set 2: All Statuses separated from (1/1/2000 00:00:00) by an infinite number of secondsOf course that, if you define time as a series of events, you'll never get an infinite amount of events when you arbitrarily set a start for those events.
S1= {U(1), U(2), ….}, S2={U(-∞), U(-∞+1), U(-∞+2),….}
3. S1 is finite & S2≠ɸ
False: it means that Set 1 has a last point where next points are away by an infinite time/seconds, but as the next point is separated by an extra 1 second, that point does not exist
4. S1≠ɸ & S2= ɸ
which is the only true and possible option
The conclusion is that
The universe had a finite number of states and had a start or beginning, Time itself had a start as well.
Is your time the real time?
I think your time is the time in a movie, with a lot of takes, but ultimately finite, with a clear maker.. or a few makers.
Is our reality just a divine movie?