RE: You can't prove a negative (parody)
April 8, 2013 at 7:38 pm
(This post was last modified: April 8, 2013 at 7:43 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(April 8, 2013 at 7:28 pm)MysticKnight Wrote: Now we are talking about what is more useful. But when a believer in God talks about his belief being useful, all attack is on the poor lad, in that it proves nothing.
We can explore in the real world which philsophy has not proven to be real what is really more useful, and for what purpose. But it would suffice for now to simply say a believer in god who admits his belief is not necessarily of any use at all to anyone else whatsoever, wouldn't be attacked.
It is that almost universal failing of believers in god that deserves them the attacks they receive - the insistence that you must play along in the privacy of your thoughts and actions with what they deem useful in their private thoughts.