RE: Atheism, Theism, Science & Philosophy
April 22, 2013 at 5:31 pm
(This post was last modified: April 22, 2013 at 5:38 pm by Love.)
Rhythm, with all due respect, I think that you are selectively ignoring my responses. You keep harping on about providing examples of supplementation to pure reason. I've provided valid examples that I am sure most philosophers would verify are valid. The best example I have provided is the scientific method; this enterprise REQUIRES empiricism along with rationalism (pure reason), and you have completely ignored this. You want me to provide you with answers to all areas that require supplemention; go and research for yourself.
I get the impression that you're being obstinate for the sake of argument. You could at least attempt to engage in the debate instead of replying with flippant and brief responses, which basically results in me repeating myself over topics that have already been covered.
I get the impression that you're being obstinate for the sake of argument. You could at least attempt to engage in the debate instead of replying with flippant and brief responses, which basically results in me repeating myself over topics that have already been covered.
