RE: All Zionists are Thieves and Murderers
May 3, 2013 at 12:38 am
(This post was last modified: May 3, 2013 at 12:58 am by A_Nony_Mouse.)
(May 3, 2013 at 12:05 am)Gearbreak Wrote: You should really consider toning down the obvious hate and bias. You make it look like a black and white issue, which makes you hard to trust as a source. It doesn't feel like you're giving me information. It feels like you're spreading hate filled propaganda. If you're correct you need to present your facts better to convince people. I feel like if I disagree with you I'd be treated with hostility. Not a good effect to have on an audience.
My bias is hardly different from favoring the Poles in 1939.
The truth cannot be hate.
It is a totally black and white issue. Eastern Europeans SAID they were going to go there and take over before Hitler was born. See the first Zionist convention is Switzerland for details.
The truth about facts and events cannot be hate.
You should have noticed I don't give a shit about my audience. I post only what I can back up with facts from sources that are impeccably both Israeli and Jewish. If you have any questions about that claim please ask specific questions.
That is a serious challenge. I caused the Dawkins open discussion forum to shut down by doing exactly that, posting impeccably Israeli and jewish sources for what I said about Israel.
I suggest before you challenge me in public, go to my website and search the subject you wish to challenge to save yourself much embarrassement.
In the US if you say send the "niggers" back to Africa people look at you funny. In Israel if you say to send the "sand niggers" back to Arabia you do it to keep your seat in Congress (Knesset) because people vote for that kind of bigotry. The former statement is just anybody. The latter statement is an elected representatitve like a Senator.
I can assure you I am not creative enough to make this up.
(May 3, 2013 at 12:06 am)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:Around 450 BC Herodotus mention the Palestinians by name. Jews are uneducated dolts and idiots.
Around 1207 BC the pharaoh Merneptah commissioned a stele for his temple which used the word Ysirir. Flinders-Petrie said it means "Israel" in spite of the fact that the word appears no where else in the entire corpus of Egyptian literature and no one really understands what it means in Egyptian.
As I understand it the word Palestine derives from the Phillistines who certainly occupied the most valuable stretch of land in the area for a few centuries....until the Assyrians came along.
First every honest person including Finkelstein in a Dever interview has said even if the word is ISRAEL it is so far out of bible context there is no way to even guess as to what that word means. It really is difficult to destroy Israel when Israelites first appear about half way through Exodus.
Second as to deriving from Philistine that is incredible and even borders upon the impossible. The issue is the GREEK ph as an F sounds. The P in Palestinian is an entirely different sound which cannot be represented as a ph.. That is one of the points I use to say the original OT was written in Greek.
(May 3, 2013 at 12:14 am)cato123 Wrote: Hey Louse,
I don't undertand why you used so much digital space proclaiming: "I'm an anti-semite".
Sorry Catt-oh but is does not work that way.
You cannot scream ANTISEMITE and declare your mission accomplished. I have facts. You have ANTISEMITE and nothing more.
Pardon if I remind you participation in this discussion requires very much more than name calling. Somebody had to do it.
(May 3, 2013 at 12:37 am)Dragonetti Wrote: The problems between Palenstine and Israel is very simple. It is land! Now, religion has played a major role, but it is all about land.
World War II.
WWII has nothing to do with the victims of the Jews.
The basic issue is in my sig.
[b]Jews stole the land. The owners want it back.[b]
That is the entire issue in nine words and there is nothing more to it than that.