Would like to say Hi!

[DeardoG]

You refer to yourself as a secular humanist, but then go on to say , { To me, the name (DeardoG) is not offensive and has no moral issue. I am not makeing my god angry. I am merely useing this name to state the fact, his name has no meaning to me. } in other words you have no issue with causing offense to others. Given your religious views, which would make you a philanthropist of sorts, why call yourself by a derogatory name which shows you to be bias to a large portion of mankind, can you not see the contradiction . ps: The use of backward spelling ie: doG is a well known satanic practise.

You're aware that being for secular humanism does not mean I have to be a saint, right? It just means I support human ethics and reasons and do not subscribe to all of that pseudoscience mumbo-jumbo.

I am bias, but I still understand the views of religious people. Unlike those said religious people of course who use names referring to god on a regular basis; is this not bias also? Just because you would support a name like "LOVE-JESUS" for example, does that mean it is a good name? To me, this name is bias and derogatory, because YOU are now disrespecting my opinions. That name to you is not derogatory, but it may be to atheists, but we do not make a fuss of this.

Uh-oh you are blind to your own hypocrisy, hehe!

Religion however means that any name used against the name of god is derogatory... how is this fair?

PS: I do not believe in god, heaven, hell or satan, therefore to me, the spelling of doG is NOT satanic practice.

---

Thanks for everyone who has given me a warm welcome by the way! Gnosis I am glad I have found someone with the same opinions!