(May 15, 2013 at 8:26 am)Rhythm Wrote:I do not know. I reckon we give ourselves an undue position of superiority or specialness apart from the rest of the animal kingdom because we're able to have a level of abstraction seemingly not present in other animals.Quote: I think this is misguided. For example ants, because they don't have the same level of abstraction that we have, can be considered wholly robotic in their behavior when they go out of their way to rescue other ants (yes, they have evolved rescuers), but do these rescue ants just follow an instinctual pattern, or do they really have a concern for the ants they're rescuing?Just as curiously....do we? Is there a distinction between instinctual patterns and concern? If so, where does that lie. Is it in the volume or the depth of it's outward expression? If so, aren't we just frequently instinctual, or hyper instinctual - relative to ants, in this regard (sometimes...lol)?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: March 2, 2025, 4:54 am
Thread Rating:
Morality in dogs? Morality Learned?
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
Toward a Planet of Dogs? | Leonardo17 | 1 | 858 |
November 9, 2023 at 9:31 am Last Post: FrustratedFool |
|
dynamic morality vs static morality or universal morality | Mystic | 18 | 4452 |
May 3, 2018 at 10:28 am Last Post: LastPoet |
|
A Lesson in the Practicality of Philosophy I Learned Today | Mudhammam | 36 | 9034 |
October 22, 2014 at 12:13 am Last Post: Mudhammam |
|
Objective Morality and Subjective Morality | Sulthus | 2 | 4337 |
January 17, 2011 at 7:28 pm Last Post: Oldandeasilyconfused |
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)