This is so exhausting to read. At every turn, we make a valid argument, and at every turn, a counter argument is made that contradicts some principal of being omnimax.
All the while, I might add, we all know that the Hebrews were exposed to Zoroastrianism while they were in captivity. We know that's where they got the idea of an entirely good god. Is it really so hard to ask yourselves if you could be wrong?
All the while, I might add, we all know that the Hebrews were exposed to Zoroastrianism while they were in captivity. We know that's where they got the idea of an entirely good god. Is it really so hard to ask yourselves if you could be wrong?
