Stimbo Wrote:When I commented that you had "play[ed] the man instead of the ball", it was in response to your dismissing whateverist's character instead of addressing his point - a textbook ad hominem attack. I did not "pick on" you and certainly never impugned your character; this was never personal and I am left wondering why you chose to interpret it as such.
Ok. let me see if i can put it in a better way.
Here we got Whateverist that make a statement in which he say that spirituality work in such and such a way.
I try to tell him that it does not make sense to judge what he does not know or something that he never practice.
As you say i did the mistake to be a bit too tough in my reply which result in a personal attack.
I thought that judging what we do not know would be like me that i never operate anyone telling a surgeon how to operate. He probably would tell me.......how the hell you know ..........i studied and practice this business for years and years and now you come with your incompetence and tell me what to do!!! Please go away.
Never mind, next time i will ask Whateverist how he come up with his conclusion in a nice manner although it may be a bit difficult to address a point based on non-experience on the subject. Ciao