RE: Denial of freedom
May 31, 2013 at 2:09 am
(This post was last modified: May 31, 2013 at 2:10 am by dazzn.)
(May 31, 2013 at 2:03 am)Violet Lilly Blossom Wrote:(May 31, 2013 at 1:59 am)dazzn Wrote: no, i know that many younger people need dominance (lol) when nobody has to submit to them. I understand how they think and I know the score.
1: If I was a younger person and younger people need dominance... why am the slave in a S&M relationship?
2: Nobody has to submit to anyone... which is to say: if that man with a gun doesn't like something you're doing, he is completely free to shoot you. Other people with guns may find issue with that, and they may not... regardless, they are free to do what they will.
3: You don't have the slightest clue how Silicoid think... it might do you some good to understand their greatest philosophical observation: "Is it rock?"
4: What's the game you know the score to?
1 - don't let reality frighten you
2 - hmmm.. this is why people always rise up against dominance lol.. if you presume you hold an absolute right to dominate others, so be it, but i doubt the vast majority in the world who exist now or ever have existed would agree. you all cited north korea, yet i will cite syria as a counter-argument.
3 - No, but I understand how the many think, including many younger people.
4 - either you're autistic, or cannot comprehend different linguistic contexts.
(May 31, 2013 at 2:07 am)cato123 Wrote:(May 31, 2013 at 1:59 am)dazzn Wrote: no, i know that many younger people need dominance (lol) when nobody has to submit to them. I understand how they think and I know the score.
Does this bit of erudition come from 'normal knowledge', which you claim to be denied; or, is this a result of some 'special knowledge'?
No, simple logic.
