(June 11, 2013 at 6:35 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:F'in hell.... I quit beating around the bushes!(June 10, 2013 at 8:44 am)pocaracas Wrote: You're claiming there was a very first event... an absolute first event.You need to refute it by proving that either my premises are wrong
All I say is... maybe not.
or a step doesn't lead to the next inside the proof
Other than that are just assertions.
You don't need to waist your time writing them.
When will you get it through that thick skull that your initial assumptions, your initial assertions, your base for the whole proof is not valid!?!!?
If the base is invalid, the whole building collapses.
Your proof, proves nothing, because it starts off wrong.
You have no way of knowing there was a first event, hence everything that follows is wrong, however logically valid the reasoning may be.