(June 12, 2013 at 7:10 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote:(June 11, 2013 at 6:47 am)pocaracas Wrote: When will you get it through that thick skull that your initial assumptions, your initial assertions, your base for the whole proof is not valid!?!!?You are very angry because I killed your "No" God!
If the base is invalid, the whole building collapses.
Your proof, proves nothing, because it starts off wrong.
You have no way of knowing there was a first event, hence everything that follows is wrong, however logically valid the reasoning may be.
My initial assumptions cannot be refuted because they are very simple and straightforward
The universe exists
The universe is dynamic
Mutually exclusive terms are "Mutually exclusive"
Here is another challenge for you
Can you bring 3 other facts in the whole world that are more solid than mine.
LOL angry... LOL, just LOL. You people always too eager to call atheists angry... This is not anger, this is facepalming, head-banging on desk and other such reactions to your inability to understand how your premisses fail.
Your initial assumptions fail because they are not verifiable. They are not obvious. They may apply to our Universe, but you then infer something out of the Universe from them, hence you need to take into account the events out of our Universe... if such a thing exists.... and those could be infinite, which lead to your assumption failing.
3 facts that are more solid than yours? LOL
Gravity exists is a good assumption for someone who lives in the vicinity of a massive object, like our planet Earth.
Red light has a longer wavelength than blue light.
My nick is pocaracas.