RE: Morality
June 13, 2013 at 1:21 am
(This post was last modified: June 13, 2013 at 1:23 am by crud.)
"Dawkin's observation is true, with no moral implication.".... well he did say: "no evil and no good"
How can this be anything other than nihilism?
If there is no good and evil.... and what I deem "good" is actually equally "evil"
Then, to hold that my actions really are "good" would just mean I'm deluding myself...
How can this be anything other than nihilism?
If there is no good and evil.... and what I deem "good" is actually equally "evil"
Then, to hold that my actions really are "good" would just mean I'm deluding myself...