RE: The flaws of Hell
June 15, 2013 at 6:18 am
(This post was last modified: June 15, 2013 at 6:19 am by Little Rik.)
(June 15, 2013 at 5:51 am)Esquilax Wrote:(June 15, 2013 at 12:03 am)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: ....and God, being the supposed omnipotent son of a bitch he is, passively allowed his creations to delve into sin. Oh wait, did I say passively allowed? He ENCOURAGED by placing the fucking tree smack dab in the middle of the garden and knew they were going to eat from it.
Responsibility still ends up falling back in his lap, since nothing occurs without God's permission.
It's actually worse than that: why did the tree need to exist in the first place? God created everything in the garden, nothing existed without his say so, and yet there's this tree; what purpose does it serve, if nobody is allowed to eat from it? Why is it there? What possible reason could there be for it to exist?
I've posed this before, and the answer I got back was that the tree was there specifically to be a temptation to sin, which... I mean... damn...
When you read books written ages ago and rewritten hundreds of time you got to be very very cautious in interpret what is written.
In the old time the priests season the original words in order to bring them in tune with their evil style of life so they could sit in the chair of power.
The evil style carry on and on and even if the present priests did not invented these false truth nevertheless they procrastinate the rot.
