RE: souls
June 16, 2013 at 1:46 pm
(This post was last modified: June 16, 2013 at 1:47 pm by Pandas United.)
(June 16, 2013 at 5:24 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:(June 15, 2013 at 10:50 pm)Pandas United Wrote: Actually, there are many good arguments for Cartesian dualism as well as several arguments against the materialistic approach to the mind.
I am not interested in arguments.
I am interested in evidence. As such, my contention holds.
You aren't interested in arguments? Oh, we should probably throw away neuroscience, several branches of philosophy like metaphysics and philosophy of mind, and we should probably throw away theoretical physics as well.
Arguments are based off of evidence, in case you didn't know. How do you try to portray something as true? You use rational arguments based off evidence from that respective field.
All generalizations are false.