Gimmah the evidence

[Little Rik]

And now you're just a liar. We don't need to worry about "intuitive science" here. Back up your words with evidence from anything that I've written. Show me where it was demonstrated that I don't know the meaning of yoga. Put up or shutup. What I recall was me asking you what the nature of my yoga was, and you pulling a bunch of shit from your ass because you were too afraid to admit that you didn't know.

Here you say that you practice yoga for 30 years.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-18616-page-9.html
I've been practicing yoga for 30 years, and my conclusion is that you are deluded and wrong. Yay, yoga!



If you really practice yoga and i mean the real yoga (tantric meditation, exercises, veg diet, fasting and so on) then you would automatically know that a robot can not develop consciousness therefore all your talking is nothing else but a load of steaming manure.
The parts to build a robot can be taken from the physical world (metal, plastic etc) but the consciousness can only be taken from a source outside this physical world and so far the scientists can not do that unless they engage in spirituality something that so far has not happened.
Your problem is that you rely on wikipedia or similar sources of information which of course are not always reliable instead of developing
the particular science that involve a particular subjet.
Love already point out to you this problem
Apophenia, I wish you would perform thorough research before posting. If you are unaware, Wikipedia is not an acceptable reference source in a postgraduate (MSc, PhD) academic setting; in certain instances, there is information in Wikipedia that is factually inaccurate.

http://atheistforums.org/thread-18616-page-6.html

to you and you have admitted your mistake


I was unaware that it occurs outside of a neurological incident. Thank you for the correction.



but unfortunately you procrastinate the rot and continue to dump load and load of rubbish and then blame other for your ignorance.hock: