RE: Gimmah the evidence
June 21, 2013 at 9:27 am
(This post was last modified: June 21, 2013 at 9:38 am by Little Rik.)
Ryantology Wrote:Intuition is among the least trustworthy approaches to understanding, because when you're right, it is only by accident. You might as well call it "blind guessing science", because that's all it really is.
Intuition is not always a clear indicator that that particular thing is correct.
It really depend especially if that particular correctness evaporated and vanish after a short time leaving nothing real.
If this failure would apply to yoga then all the people who practice intuitional science since 7000 years ago then it would mean that they all did so much hard work for nothing.
Unfortunately you forgot something and that is the fact that together with intuition come the pleasure that one feel when the chains (karma or reactions) that encase you in this body are less and less heavy.
Quote:Computers don't rely on magic and spirits to function. They rely on electrical impulses. Just like our brains. Software is stored physically and processed physically. Our consciousness needs to be nothing more than advanced software running on biological computing substrate.
"You" are nothing more than the dynamic pattern generated by all those impulses, accessing memories and subroutines. No mysticism necessary.
Your deep intellectuality does not explain where the free will is gone if as you say our consciousness is driven by something else.
Enrico Wrote:You mean like saying that God does not exist?
Quote:Just like that, which is why you don't run into a lot of atheists who commit to a complete, philosophically positive claim on that score (if only to prevent this dead horse from being beaten anew).
You must be in possess of reliable statistics that confirm your theory.
GIMMAH the evidence please.
Oh by the way, what happen to you?
Is not that Childsgod convert you?
I did not read any of your usual swearing for a few days!!!
(June 21, 2013 at 8:31 am)Tonus Wrote:(June 20, 2013 at 11:55 pm)enrico Wrote: I do not dispute that you can or can not comprehend what i say.
That is not the problem.
The problem is to feel and experience.
So until I experience insanity firsthand, I won't comprehend you?
Insanity is also to postpone the day in which one decide to stop to be encased in a physical body and be free.
But of course you can't argue with INSANITY.