Gimmah the evidence

[Little Rik]

He said nothing about testing 'intuitive science' (I cringed even typing that meaningless phrase). He stated that scientists often get intuitions about something they are studying, but there is no way to know if the intuition is correct without testing it. Testing the specific thing they intuited, not intuition itself. But, as soon as you claim that intuition's effects manifest some way in the physical universe, your claim becomes testable. That's the way reality works. You make all these claims, then when we insist on evidence for them, you tack on another claim about their untestability. How convenient...

If you would have read my previous post in a different thread you would have noted that i said that a particular thing has got to be tested in the right laboratory.
Consciousness can only be tested within not outside however by looking at the aura you can see the purity within.
You guys even got this angel with the aureola on the head but i guess you never bother to know the meaning nor to know the meaning of the paintings of saints with the aureola on their head around the pineal gland.
You also post in the philosophy thread without even knowing the real meaning of philosophy which makes a mockery of your contradictions.

As i already said in previous post not only is a science but is the older science ever as it was taught 7000 years ago by Shiva.

But it can't be demonstrated to be true.

How would you like to be demonstrated?
By physical science?
Again you try to use the wrong tool.

Science (from Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge") is a systematic enterprise that builds and organizes knowledge in the form of testable explanations and predictions about the universe. In an older and closely related meaning, "science" also refers to a body of knowledge itself, of the type that can be rationally explained and reliably applied.
As soon as you are able to accomplish the above statements in bold regarding your claim of 'intuitive science', you may have something. Until then, you're pretty much talking out of your ass.

.........only about the universe you say?
Sorry that is incorrect.
I guess you may take your information from wikipedia which are not always reliable. You are doing the same mistake that apophenia does all the time.

Nope. The truth does not change. What changes is human understanding.
And what changes human understanding? Demonstrable evidence and reasoned argument, neither of which you seem to be able to produce with regards to 'intuitive science' (Oh, I cringed again).

When you say that the truth does not change i do agree with you.
Your problem however is that you still do not understand what is truth and what is not.
This universe is a passing panorama in which everything move and change all the time.
You try to hold even for a second anything within this universe and you will fail but if you try to hold something within the arena of spirituality you will find that is never changing so from here is easy to see where the truth lies.

And of course you can support your claim that an entity exists that is 'behind time and space', right...

When you die physically and mental speaking your consciousness automatically take over and this has been experienced by all those who had a NDE experience which they also felt to be part of the the cosmic consciousness (God).

Better yet, see what is happening in China right now. Capitalism is going strong there. And they have a population 5 times the size of Brazil and Turkey combined.

China is rotten within.
The pollution the exploitation the corruption the censorship the lack of brides the lack of fertile land the food adulteration the diseases coming from animals keep in cages the lack of social services and medical assistance and now the economic slow down due to other countries difficulty.
This is a recipe for disaster.
I wouldn't bet a cent on China unless a new system take over.

As soon as you can demonstrate that 'outside of the cage' exists, get back to us.

You can experience within by practicing intuitional science or you can read thousand of NDE experiences.

---

Not at all. You are fussy and boring only when you try to be picky and when you come down with your holy truth without first try to understand other people logic in the context of the sentences.

Oh yeah. It's always that "other people logic" that trips me up.

When you are in a moving vehicle and you try to take a perfect picture of the panorama that want be very easy because you as a human being do not have a perfect camera as far as your senses and your brain is concern.
I was reading in a medical report that our physical and mental capacity can only store around 5% of what is there.
Now this may be true or near the truth in any case when you rely on the universal realty as a benchmark to state your logic then is very likely that you will fail miserably.
That is why is important to get the correct information from the correct sources.