(June 24, 2013 at 1:37 am)fr0d0 Wrote: You have got to be kidding me! Those dictionary definitions back up exactly what I'm saying.No, and I already explained why.
(June 24, 2013 at 1:37 am)fr0d0 Wrote: And the nature of God is well known. I could justifiably assume you should be aquatinted with that. If you're meaning bare as in unproven naturally, then that would be absurd of course.Every one of you believers has your own happy-horseshit version of the fairy tale, and your own particular regimen of cherry-picking. I can't be bothered or expected to keep track.
As for the transfiguration, it seems we are in agreement that the bible's account of that is something between tall tale and complete fiction, so there's nothing further to be said there.
(June 24, 2013 at 1:37 am)fr0d0 Wrote: I believe I did answer the question, but let me say it again: We have reason to believe that prayer is answered if we first believe that what the bible says is true.LOL!