"I'll pray for you."

[fr0d0]

The only thing I'm asking you to prove is why you feel you can correctly claim that all prayer is answered consistently while simultaneously mocking the claim that prayers are answered inconsistently for the fact that it is a claim beyond our scope of knowledge.

The claim that all prayer is answered consistently is absolutely logical, in the way that I framed it, addressing the Christian understanding of prayer. God answers according to his will, that we are not privy to.

The opposing claim that prayers are answered inconsistently are laughable. They don't address a supernatural God, therefore failing before they begin.

The answers are beyond our scope of knowledge. That process the above two assertions.

---

remember which of us is claiming that all prayers are answered by his/her pet god.

That claim holds. You cannot disprove it.

There's a follow up question... how do you know if the answer is from God.

---

-then there is no basis for proposing that any effect was supernatural, (nor have we seen anything that would suggest any "effect" at all, of any kind).... -in the first place-. End of.

Thanks for getting my back bro

---

@ zarith
Your first response doesn't make too much sense. Please correct the English if you'd like me to respond

r2. I believe the interpretation is validated scripturally and computes. I don't place the importance on the event that Catholics do.

r3. That is a correct response