(June 27, 2013 at 4:32 am)raycomfort Wrote:It seems to me that publicising this 'explanation' is Ray trying to head-off any backlash from the 'atheist community' before the bad press actually hits. Otherwise, he'd just say this to PZ's face, surely? Further, the fact that he feels the need to explain could be a sign of a guilty conscience.
In this scenario, if the editing fundamentally changes the meaning of the remaining content, it's misrepresentation whether deliberate or accidental. If I were accused of such misrepresentation, instead of posting 'excuses', I'd be having a look to see where my accidental errors were so I could fix them and preserve the original meaning of the content.
My suspicions are aroused...
Sum ergo sum