(June 29, 2013 at 8:42 pm)Koolay Wrote: If someone initiates violence upon you or your property, you are within right to use violence to stop that action and ensure safety of people and property. There is a clear difference between initiating violence and violence for defence.
Who determines this right? There is still law in this society? If there is law, who is enforcing it?
In a hypothetical scenario where someone initiates violence on someone physically weaker and successfully kills him. Who kills the initiator? Whoever kills the initiator would be doing it out of justice and not defence right? If the initiator is not attacking anyone after he kills his victim. Is that ok? Because isn't that what the government attempts to do if they jail someone who is convicted for murder? If it's not ok to kill out of justice, does that mean in this society as long as you pick on people who are weaker than you, you will thrive?
Doesn't sound very appealing.
