(July 1, 2013 at 7:51 pm)Koolay Wrote:You are defining the social contract as something which is entered into voluntarily. You say if you do not give your consent, you are not a member of that contract. However, the reality is that while you are voluntarily a member of a society, you implicitly accept that contract. Every time you stop at a red light, or walk past a jewelry store without smashing a display case and taking some gold, or allow a person to walk away who has insulted you, you are showing that you accept the terms, and are willing to abide by them.(July 1, 2013 at 7:38 pm)bennyboy Wrote: Your semantics are at odds with the reality of the situation.
What do you mean by this?
I don't care if it is unpopular, am I right or wrong is all I am concerned about. This is philosophy after all.
If you do not like the rules, you have an obligation to remove yourself from the benefits which the society provide: safety, opportunity, etc. Someone who drives on roads paid for by taxes, but refuses to pay taxes because he "never explicitly agreed" to do so, is a parasite. Someone who enjoys the physical safety guaranteed by the police must accept that his own freedoms will be limited by those same police-- or else, he is a parasite.
So basically, an anarchist as I see it is someone who isn't a powerful politician, but wants to live like one. This seems hypocritical to me.