Bolding is mine.
I smell sarcasm...
Yeah because getting your information from a source that must cite all of its sources, must remain neutral, and must be steadily confirmed by OTHER sources as well [or failing that possibility must display all valid, alternative claims] automatically instigates a negative connotation, right? I mean, wikipedia! Jeez, it's almost like it uses the scientific method mixed with encyclopedic standards!
OH WAIT.
It does. Are you saying that the scientific method is flawed?
Also, how do you know any of this stuff? Where did you read it from? And how positive are you that it isn't biased? If you bring up a source that happens to be written by one of his followers, PROTIP: NOT UNBIASED.
I smell sarcasm...
(July 7, 2013 at 5:43 am)enrico Wrote: I know that you get all your information from your deep INTUITION and not from Wikipedia and beside knowing that you spend 30 years doing yoga you must be very well able to answer my question without any problem.
Thanks if you can help.
Yeah because getting your information from a source that must cite all of its sources, must remain neutral, and must be steadily confirmed by OTHER sources as well [or failing that possibility must display all valid, alternative claims] automatically instigates a negative connotation, right? I mean, wikipedia! Jeez, it's almost like it uses the scientific method mixed with encyclopedic standards!
OH WAIT.
It does. Are you saying that the scientific method is flawed?
Also, how do you know any of this stuff? Where did you read it from? And how positive are you that it isn't biased? If you bring up a source that happens to be written by one of his followers, PROTIP: NOT UNBIASED.