Gimmah the evidence

[Little Rik]

Yeah because getting your information from a source that must cite all of its sources, must remain neutral, and must be steadily confirmed by OTHER sources as well [or failing that possibility must display all valid, alternative claims] automatically instigates a negative connotation, right? I mean, wikipedia! Jeez, it's almost like it uses the scientific method mixed with encyclopedic standards!
OH WAIT.It does. Are you saying that the scientific method is flawed?
Also, how do you know any of this stuff? Where did you read it from? And how positive are you that it isn't biased? If you bring up a source that happens to be written by one of his followers, PROTIP: NOT UNBIASED.

Not all the information coming from Wiki are incorrect but many are that is why in the scientific world this source is not taken in much consideration.
In the specific case in which apophenia tell us about Sarkar the matter is absolutely ridiculous.
The person writing about Sarkar must have taken information through the media, the media took the information through the police and the police made up all the story in order to hide their crimes their corruption and to follow Indira Gandhi order so they could continue to procrastinate the now EX dictatorship.
Why Little Enrico know all this?
Well little Enrico when was 22 years young went in India for the first time just during these events. He was there before and after Sarkar arrest which by the way happen in Patliputra colony Bihar india.

---

Every single time you come up with one of your mental masturbation i show your mistakes and stupidity but you keep on coming back for more punishment.
I just try to work out if this is a form of masochism or just pure madness?
If you do not feel any respect for yourself at least you should show some respect for your friends within the atheist circle for these continuous embarrassments.hock:

---

Enrico, do you recall that little conversation we had a while back about the difference between good and bad teachers and the importance of 'rejecting' the bad ones when they're shown to be bad? Yeah, this is sort of what I had in mind.

I do agree that the bad teachers should be rejected.
But in order to know whether a teacher is good or bad you need to go through some test isn't it Stimbo?
Why should i reject a teacher that was proven good?