RE: gods' test
December 31, 2009 at 9:29 pm
(This post was last modified: December 31, 2009 at 10:02 pm by ib.me.ub.)
@Ugly animal man. Firstly, don't put words into my mouth. The two arguments you have put forward to me have had no correleation to what I have said whatsoever. If you are trying to read between the lines, I suggest you look a little harder.
Next, I also find it very amusing how you make absoulte statements about certain subjects i.e
Thirdly, Yes and if you look closely at my responce before this one I did mention the above informnation . How about you take my entire response and respond to that. If there is a question answer it, but chopping up sections of debate and responding to certain parts, and ignoring the other parts is sheer disregard to the dabate as a whole, and what is being said. It is the same as when media take a sound bite and make it look how they would like to portray it.
Your last point does not even merit a responce.
![[Image: evolution.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=atheistforums.org%2Fimages%2Fminisigs%2Fevolution.png)
Can this statement be true then?
@THE void: You may refer to my signature....
Next, I also find it very amusing how you make absoulte statements about certain subjects i.e
Quote:But you cannot pass on knowledge from one generation to the next in ths way.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
me Wrote:Isn't that why people are getting smarter, faster, stronger and better at the things we do!
uglyanimal Wrote:People get smarter by education and by buidling on knowledge of previous generations captured on media (books, DVD, movie, what have you) or provided by that generation itself. Also there is the dynamic of culture that plays a significant role. So this is not the biological evolution but cultural evolution. We learn from each other. There may be a genetic effect also, but as far as I know it has not been verified yet. The common scientific take on this at the moment is that we are not smarter than Cro-Magnon, which is an early form of homo sapiens really.
Thirdly, Yes and if you look closely at my responce before this one I did mention the above informnation . How about you take my entire response and respond to that. If there is a question answer it, but chopping up sections of debate and responding to certain parts, and ignoring the other parts is sheer disregard to the dabate as a whole, and what is being said. It is the same as when media take a sound bite and make it look how they would like to portray it.
Your last point does not even merit a responce.
Can this statement be true then?
@THE void: You may refer to my signature....
