RE: Blind faith and evolution
July 19, 2013 at 5:35 pm
(This post was last modified: July 19, 2013 at 8:07 pm by Cyberman.)
Nobody mentioned knowing everything. That's not a requirement for knowing something, nor is it required to investigate that which we don't know. BBT has been tested and continues to be tested - so far, it's survived. Incidentally, that was not always the case; for the longest time, until observation techniques had been refined and the data measured, the Steady State model was the leading hypothesis. Now the Big Bang model best fits the known facts. Seriously, read up on this stuff. It truly is a fascinating journey of investigation, with some unique indiduals.
By the way, I'd still like to know what BBT has to do with evolution. Both theories have overwhelming corroborating evidence, but are hardly interchangeable.
Edit: Corrected embarrassing Grauniad-style typo.
By the way, I'd still like to know what BBT has to do with evolution. Both theories have overwhelming corroborating evidence, but are hardly interchangeable.
Edit: Corrected embarrassing Grauniad-style typo.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'