RE: Blind faith and evolution
July 20, 2013 at 1:18 pm
(This post was last modified: July 20, 2013 at 1:19 pm by christcahinkilla.)
now that you've all had some time to think for yourselves and not just defend you belief like some kind of jesus fucker let me ask again,
concerning the topic of dieties only (i am not saying i don't know anything infidel)
theist - "i believe gods exist, but can't prove it"
atheist - "i do not believe gods exist, but can't prove it"
both of these ideas say the same thing: i KNOW but can't prove it to be true
agnostic - "i do not have a belief on the subject because I have no way to test the idea"
it takes a genius to admit that they don't know something they do not know, it doesn't mean you say you don't know anything.
belief = disbelief = hypothesis to conclusion without experimentation; dogma
agnostic atheist is therefore oxymoronic
concerning the topic of dieties only (i am not saying i don't know anything infidel)
theist - "i believe gods exist, but can't prove it"
atheist - "i do not believe gods exist, but can't prove it"
both of these ideas say the same thing: i KNOW but can't prove it to be true
agnostic - "i do not have a belief on the subject because I have no way to test the idea"
it takes a genius to admit that they don't know something they do not know, it doesn't mean you say you don't know anything.
belief = disbelief = hypothesis to conclusion without experimentation; dogma
agnostic atheist is therefore oxymoronic
