RE: Proof of Christianity
August 13, 2013 at 3:07 am
(This post was last modified: August 13, 2013 at 3:12 am by fr0d0.)
(August 12, 2013 at 11:32 pm)Captain Colostomy Wrote: Meh. I think(without confirmation) a matrilineal lineage makes zero sense...other than as apologetic tripe. I thought common practice was to follow the father's line.
Then you deny the fact that this is what Jews believe. Don't take my word for it, go look it up.
Min is correct. The genealogies don't appear to be accurate. There are many attempts at explaining that. You might notice that I never said anything to contradict that.
The facts remain : what we do know, that the blood line is female, and the title passes through the male line.
teg, if you checked the link I provided you'd see what you're struggling to find out.
(August 13, 2013 at 3:06 am)teaearlgreyhot Wrote: So, if culture in the future needed interpret the bible to where Jesus was actually a crack dealer and a pimp and the apostles were his crack whores, you'd be cool with it?
Why not? Pretty similar has already been done.