(August 18, 2013 at 5:25 am)EvidenceVersusFaith Wrote: Knowledge is absolute anyway, in a sense, if that is what he means, unless it is relative evidence (i.e. not proof) or information (rather than proof or true awareness of something truly real). That is, someone could correctly call that (evidence or information) relative knowledge, perhaps. I mean, I reckon that that would be a semantic matter after all anyway, I think.
I thought he might mean knowing everything about everything.
But it is such a woolly phrase you can project many meanings onto it.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.