RE: Is Hell Really a Bad Place?
August 20, 2013 at 12:08 am
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2013 at 12:12 am by Godscreated.)
(August 19, 2013 at 5:43 pm)Michael Schubert Wrote:(August 19, 2013 at 2:40 pm)Godschild Wrote: I know highly regarded scientists and nuclear engineers, and all agree that carbon dating falls apart after 50,000 years and other nonbelievers on here have agreed. These people are honest enough not to lie about the reality of the limits science has, unlike you.
The Strawman Fallacy. I know very well that no one knows everything about anything. I also know that transitional fossils are numerous in paleontologists' research.
Religious people, however, like Ray Comfort and Ken Ham, claim to have absolute knowledge of life, and they are benighted.
And yes, carbon dating is not the only method of studying fossils. Do you ever take a medicine for a headache or anything else? If so, thank an evolutionary scientist.
Some one please bang on the record player, it's stuck in a groove.
(August 19, 2013 at 4:37 pm)BadWriterSparty Wrote: GC, when did we start debating the composition of fossils, and how is it relevant to the argument at hand?
Don't ask me ask MS.
GC(August 19, 2013 at 2:55 pm)Psykhronic Wrote: There are other kinds of dating besides carbon dating. All have different timespans where they are useful. Example - Uranium-lead dating has a range of 1 million to about 4.5 billion years ago.
That is supposed, it's not reliable.
GC
God loves those who believe and those who do not and the same goes for me, you have no choice in this matter. That puts the matter of total free will to rest.
