(August 20, 2013 at 12:08 am)Godschild Wrote:(August 19, 2013 at 2:55 pm)Psykhronic Wrote: There are other kinds of dating besides carbon dating. All have different timespans where they are useful. Example - Uranium-lead dating has a range of 1 million to about 4.5 billion years ago.
That is supposed, it's not reliable.
GC
Your statement that is is not reliable carries no weight. Dating methods using radioactive decay are reliable, the science is sound.
And carbon dating doesn't "fall apart" after 50,00 years - it has a measurable range. If you actually understood the physics, you would know this. But no, you spout AIG crapola.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.