(August 20, 2013 at 12:08 am)Godschild Wrote:(August 19, 2013 at 2:55 pm)Psykhronic Wrote: There are other kinds of dating besides carbon dating. All have different timespans where they are useful. Example - Uranium-lead dating has a range of 1 million to about 4.5 billion years ago.
That is supposed, it's not reliable.
What's the basis for your claim of unreliability?
What about samarium-neodymium?
Potassium-argon?
Rubidium-strontium?
Uranium-thorium?
Argon-argon?
Iodine-xenon?
Lanthanum-barium?
Lead-lead?
Lutetium-hafnium?
Neon-neon?
Rhenium-osmium?
Uranium-lead-helium?
Uranium-uranium?
All unreliable, yes?
What about fission track? Luminescence?
How about Isochron dating?
They're all unreliable because... because Godschild says so?