(August 20, 2013 at 2:39 pm)Godschild Wrote:(August 20, 2013 at 1:45 pm)Chas Wrote: Your statement that is is not reliable carries no weight. Dating methods using radioactive decay are reliable, the science is sound.
And carbon dating doesn't "fall apart" after 50,00 years - it has a measurable range. If you actually understood the physics, you would know this. But no, you spout AIG crapola.
No I sight reputable nuclear engineers and scientist, some who are known around the country and scientific community.
Then please cite a couple. Otherwise, your statement is without merit.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
