REPTILIAN RULERS EXPOSED

[fr0d0]

---

I don't really know what you're saying here TW. 'Imposed' is a loaded qualification. I'd say morality is learned and inspired, and also innate. In Nazi society a certain moral compass was unnaturally imposed. It follows that a person not choosing to follow 'healthy' morals (which is what I'd call Christian morals) would be similarly at risk of skewed morals.

An 'inner voice' is corruptible internally and externally.

---

I beg to differ.
A human only becomes what they're exposed to, what they learn through experiences. The moral guidance that is taught, becomes that inner guide to morality which is that little voice. The innate morals are only morals that have become second nature through repeated practice-reinforcement. Obviously bad behaviour will have negative consequences and so will deter a thinking person from repeating such acts; conversely, treating others appropriately will tend to produce 'good' results and reinforces those.
Inspired morals!?
I think the bible is what you mean here. And it is essentially the same thing as being taught to live in a way that was considered to be in accordance with "god's" wishes a long time ago. I call following this uninspired.

So you're sure that a human personality is entirely learned. Interesting. Not that it deters from my point at all.

Inspired = biblical! ...methinks you are being too judgemental. Why should encompassing something old be uninspired. What a jerk statement.