This guy is a one of a kind!
Let's keep him!
And I got my first Nobel Prix! yeah!
Ah, yes, it was a typo... if you notice, there's the symbol of a mobile phone right next to the post number. That means the post was written using the mobile version of the forum, which I use when I'm on my phone... and we all know those damn gadgets like to think they know what we want to write... Sometimes, I miss the automatic word that swype introduces.... apparently, people write 'good' more often than 'god'.
Onwards...
My version of the question was the good one... it's the one that represents my experience on this planet, and the experience many others claim to have: no amount of unbiased experimentation has yet yielded a god, any god!
You claim I can come to know some god in that manner... how do you know this?
Let's keep him!
(September 3, 2013 at 5:10 pm)Father Herman Wrote: 3 to: pocaracas (post 24) a Nobel Prize for perfecting cluelessness (“The poe is strong on this one.”). I like your pseudonyn, by the way. Trips nicely on the tongue.Why I (or anyone) need a pseudonym? The web is dark and full of mysteries... (kudos to whoever gets the reference!)
Why the hell do you need a pseudonym?
And I got my first Nobel Prix! yeah!
(September 3, 2013 at 5:10 pm)Father Herman Wrote: 12 A second for pocaracas! (post 57) for attempting to think. If something good exists, you should believe that it exists just because it exists. No other reason is relevant.
But “good” may be a typo for “God.” The wrong question is the one you asked: “Why can't I come to know God from my own unbiased research?” The right question is “can I come to know God from my own unbiased research?”
You can.
Ah, yes, it was a typo... if you notice, there's the symbol of a mobile phone right next to the post number. That means the post was written using the mobile version of the forum, which I use when I'm on my phone... and we all know those damn gadgets like to think they know what we want to write... Sometimes, I miss the automatic word that swype introduces.... apparently, people write 'good' more often than 'god'.
Onwards...
My version of the question was the good one... it's the one that represents my experience on this planet, and the experience many others claim to have: no amount of unbiased experimentation has yet yielded a god, any god!
You claim I can come to know some god in that manner... how do you know this?