(September 3, 2013 at 6:10 pm)genkaus Wrote:(September 3, 2013 at 6:03 pm)Chas Wrote: But that is exactly the point. Your examples are created by societies/religions. They are not applicable to our solitary person, they are external to him/her.
You do know what 'applicable' means, right? What something is created by and what it is applicable to are two different things. And being external to the person does not affect the applicability.
(September 3, 2013 at 6:03 pm)Chas Wrote: Morality is behavior, and behavior matters in the context of other people. It doesn't matter what our solitary person does - it cannot be judged moral or immoral. There is no one to judge.
Don't make me keep repeating the same refutation. That person is there to judge. His behavior matters to him. His behavior has a significant and observable effect on himself. Which is why it can be judged as moral or immoral.
So you are saying that each person determines his or her morality, what is or isn't moral?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.